<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Message to MilBloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 02:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: live stock quote</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>live stock quote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;live stock quote...&lt;/strong&gt;

Last Wednesday I visit your Army Live &quot; A Message to MilBloggers site ,I have a special experience after reading  your live stock quote site/blog....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>live stock quote&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Last Wednesday I visit your Army Live &#8221; A Message to MilBloggers site ,I have a special experience after reading  your live stock quote site/blog&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFC MAC</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>SFC MAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>That’s scary as hell. Most milbloggers I know are fiercely patriotic and loyal to Army and Country. OPSEC is usually not an issue. What gives with the Senior Non-Coms and Officers?

This whole crackdown on CJ&#039;s freedom of speech occured when he simply said what is on the minds of most Active Duty and retired Soldiers; Obama&#039;s an unfit, socialist idiot who&#039;s destroying our economy and national security. 

Then, civilian PTA members tried to bully him via his chain of command, because he discussed their arrogance. 


Give &#039;em hell CJ.

HOOAH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s scary as hell. Most milbloggers I know are fiercely patriotic and loyal to Army and Country. OPSEC is usually not an issue. What gives with the Senior Non-Coms and Officers?</p>
<p>This whole crackdown on CJ&#8217;s freedom of speech occured when he simply said what is on the minds of most Active Duty and retired Soldiers; Obama&#8217;s an unfit, socialist idiot who&#8217;s destroying our economy and national security. </p>
<p>Then, civilian PTA members tried to bully him via his chain of command, because he discussed their arrogance. </p>
<p>Give &#8216;em hell CJ.</p>
<p>HOOAH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouhammer's Afghanistan and Military Blog</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bouhammer's Afghanistan and Military Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>[...] That is partially why I am writing this post, because I think she may be just so positive that she either does not see the negatives that happen in the military towards bloggers or she just refuses to believe it. I think that is what led her to write the posting she did at http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That is partially why I am writing this post, because I think she may be just so positive that she either does not see the negatives that happen in the military towards bloggers or she just refuses to believe it. I think that is what led her to write the posting she did at <a href="http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/" rel="nofollow">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouhammer</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Bouhammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>I have taken a lot of time to analyze this and think about my response. It is now posted at http://www.bouhammer.com/2010/01/bouhammer-responds-to-army-social-media-division/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have taken a lot of time to analyze this and think about my response. It is now posted at <a href="http://www.bouhammer.com/2010/01/bouhammer-responds-to-army-social-media-division/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bouhammer.com/2010/01/bouhammer-responds-to-army-social-media-division/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROBERT SHINDELBOWER</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>ROBERT SHINDELBOWER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>THE AMERICAN WARRIOR
A TRUE AMERICAN WARRIOR ULTIMATE VICTORY IS TO LAY DOWN THEIR WEAPONS, AND TO LIVE IN PEACE.
THESE WARRIORS MAY SERVE IN THE U.S.AIR FORCE, U.S.ARMY, U.S.COAST GUARD, U.S.MARINE, OR U.S.NAVY, THEY SERVE WITH HONOR AND PRIDE, AND WHEN CALLED UPON AND WITHOUT QUESTION THEY GLADLY FIGHT FOR AND POSSIBLY DIE FOR A TASTE THAT THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW AND THAT TASTE IS FREEDOM, GOD, AND OF THIS BLESSED AMERICA.
THEREFORE, TO THESE HUMBLE BUT PROUD AMERICAN WARRIORS, GIVE THEM YOUR  PROFOUND THANKS, THAT THEY SO GREATLY DESERVE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE AMERICAN WARRIOR<br />
A TRUE AMERICAN WARRIOR ULTIMATE VICTORY IS TO LAY DOWN THEIR WEAPONS, AND TO LIVE IN PEACE.<br />
THESE WARRIORS MAY SERVE IN THE U.S.AIR FORCE, U.S.ARMY, U.S.COAST GUARD, U.S.MARINE, OR U.S.NAVY, THEY SERVE WITH HONOR AND PRIDE, AND WHEN CALLED UPON AND WITHOUT QUESTION THEY GLADLY FIGHT FOR AND POSSIBLY DIE FOR A TASTE THAT THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW AND THAT TASTE IS FREEDOM, GOD, AND OF THIS BLESSED AMERICA.<br />
THEREFORE, TO THESE HUMBLE BUT PROUD AMERICAN WARRIORS, GIVE THEM YOUR  PROFOUND THANKS, THAT THEY SO GREATLY DESERVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanani Fong</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanani Fong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Dear All, 
I&#039;ve been in the writing biz for over 25 years. I&#039;ve read, edited, written the gamut of things ranging from the sublime to the utterly ridiculous. I&#039;ve gone from typewriters and carbon paper to the internet. Let me tell you, it&#039;s been one heck of ride. In this time I&#039;ve watched the craft grow to include the instantaneous but also pleasurable but risky acts of social networking.

Blogs are an odd beast altogether. They all share elements of personal diary, reporter, opinion, with faint whiff of P.T. Barnum. They can be read by a large audience, and blogs document what&#039;s going on at the time in the mind of the writer. Social networking --whether it&#039;s a 140 character tweet, a status change on Facebook, or a 300 word blog post, is intensely personal.

It&#039;s for this reason that I find myself disagreeing with Ms. Kyzer on almost every single point. While I understand the well-intentioned suggestion were to help make self-preservation possible, each goes against the grain of the writer&#039;s craft and also that one thing we hold sacrosanct: freedom of expression.

If one wants to cause dissent, start putting down all sorts of rules! Tell people to use a nom de plume, avoid politics, tell us that little bro is watching, not to dis the boss and people take it as a personal affront. As an aside, through history, great struggles have been brought to life in the form of novels, stories, operas, epic poems, movies, music and plays. They have inspired people in a myriad of ways --both positive and not. Well-written blogs that articulately convey the writer&#039;s struggle can also serve to enlighten and move. That&#039;s why I think it&#039;s important to remember this before setting down a bunch of rules.

This doesn&#039;t mean that the writer throws caution to the wind. But, I happen to think the person who doesn&#039;t blog anonymously holds themselves to a high standard of how they frame what they&#039;re writing. What I write is done so with great deliberation, and I understand that I&#039;m responsible for everything on it. So if I say something that irks someone, maybe for one second (or two or three or four), they ought to put stock into the fact that I&#039;ve considered &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; publishing it. But the fact that I have means I&#039;ve framed it, edited it. I&#039;ve hit the &quot;publish&quot; button because I want those I&#039;m criticizing to pay attention!

In regards to the rest of your suggestions, go back to remembering that blogs are a direct reflection of what&#039;s going on in the mindset of the person writing the blog. All sorts of emotions are going to come out. It&#039;s inescapable. 

In regards to the silence, we were successful. How do we know? Because you noticed. 
Like I&#039;ve said, this has been one heck of a &lt;i&gt;long ride&lt;/i&gt; but I wouldn&#039;t have missed a single bit of it ...even the bumpy parts.
Best,
Kanani Fong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear All,<br />
I&#8217;ve been in the writing biz for over 25 years. I&#8217;ve read, edited, written the gamut of things ranging from the sublime to the utterly ridiculous. I&#8217;ve gone from typewriters and carbon paper to the internet. Let me tell you, it&#8217;s been one heck of ride. In this time I&#8217;ve watched the craft grow to include the instantaneous but also pleasurable but risky acts of social networking.</p>
<p>Blogs are an odd beast altogether. They all share elements of personal diary, reporter, opinion, with faint whiff of P.T. Barnum. They can be read by a large audience, and blogs document what&#8217;s going on at the time in the mind of the writer. Social networking &#8211;whether it&#8217;s a 140 character tweet, a status change on Facebook, or a 300 word blog post, is intensely personal.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s for this reason that I find myself disagreeing with Ms. Kyzer on almost every single point. While I understand the well-intentioned suggestion were to help make self-preservation possible, each goes against the grain of the writer&#8217;s craft and also that one thing we hold sacrosanct: freedom of expression.</p>
<p>If one wants to cause dissent, start putting down all sorts of rules! Tell people to use a nom de plume, avoid politics, tell us that little bro is watching, not to dis the boss and people take it as a personal affront. As an aside, through history, great struggles have been brought to life in the form of novels, stories, operas, epic poems, movies, music and plays. They have inspired people in a myriad of ways &#8211;both positive and not. Well-written blogs that articulately convey the writer&#8217;s struggle can also serve to enlighten and move. That&#8217;s why I think it&#8217;s important to remember this before setting down a bunch of rules.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean that the writer throws caution to the wind. But, I happen to think the person who doesn&#8217;t blog anonymously holds themselves to a high standard of how they frame what they&#8217;re writing. What I write is done so with great deliberation, and I understand that I&#8217;m responsible for everything on it. So if I say something that irks someone, maybe for one second (or two or three or four), they ought to put stock into the fact that I&#8217;ve considered <i>not</i> publishing it. But the fact that I have means I&#8217;ve framed it, edited it. I&#8217;ve hit the &#8220;publish&#8221; button because I want those I&#8217;m criticizing to pay attention!</p>
<p>In regards to the rest of your suggestions, go back to remembering that blogs are a direct reflection of what&#8217;s going on in the mindset of the person writing the blog. All sorts of emotions are going to come out. It&#8217;s inescapable. </p>
<p>In regards to the silence, we were successful. How do we know? Because you noticed.<br />
Like I&#8217;ve said, this has been one heck of a <i>long ride</i> but I wouldn&#8217;t have missed a single bit of it &#8230;even the bumpy parts.<br />
Best,<br />
Kanani Fong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Rose</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>White Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>I have lots of questions in reguards to Ms Kyzer’s comment and since I am not in the military maybe I am missing out on some rule some where. But to me, her “advice” lacks something. It doesn’t address the injustice that CJ suffered when in the role of “parent”, he was discriminated against. This discrimination was not just by the school and the PTA, but by his command. Grisham’s service should have never been an issue in the PTA meeting. The police should have NEVER been called! And his command should have listened to the complainants and then asked the question, “Was Grisham acting on behalf of the Army, or as a parent?”

If this kind of injustice and discrimination is the norm, then I would recommend that military service personal NOT have children, don’t have a life out side the military, heck, don’t even fall in love and get married! If you do, someone in the civilian world may not like it and go to your command. If that happens you can kiss you military career goodbye, because they will not stand up for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have lots of questions in reguards to Ms Kyzer’s comment and since I am not in the military maybe I am missing out on some rule some where. But to me, her “advice” lacks something. It doesn’t address the injustice that CJ suffered when in the role of “parent”, he was discriminated against. This discrimination was not just by the school and the PTA, but by his command. Grisham’s service should have never been an issue in the PTA meeting. The police should have NEVER been called! And his command should have listened to the complainants and then asked the question, “Was Grisham acting on behalf of the Army, or as a parent?”</p>
<p>If this kind of injustice and discrimination is the norm, then I would recommend that military service personal NOT have children, don’t have a life out side the military, heck, don’t even fall in love and get married! If you do, someone in the civilian world may not like it and go to your command. If that happens you can kiss you military career goodbye, because they will not stand up for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Rose Adventures &#187; &#8220;Army Live&#8221; responds to Milbloggers &#8220;Silence&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>White Rose Adventures &#187; &#8220;Army Live&#8221; responds to Milbloggers &#8220;Silence&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>[...] a Public Affairs Specialist, with the Online and Social Media Division of the Army, posted a &#8220;Message to Milbloggers&#8221; a couple of days ago on the &#8216;Army Live&#8217; blog. This is the official blog of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a Public Affairs Specialist, with the Online and Social Media Division of the Army, posted a &#8220;Message to Milbloggers&#8221; a couple of days ago on the &#8216;Army Live&#8217; blog. This is the official blog of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>I agree military bearing must be maintained at all times as does all behavior in a job; the military and us as a country must do our utmost to make sure things are professional and run well at all times because this involves millions of lives every day and the protection of billions including our own country. I think we the families have a duty too to make sure things go smoothly so that they might do their job to the best of their ability and to comment out of turn sometimes violates certain things that can harm troops or our security. If we have questions we should take them up with our senators who can look into things but if it needs to be quieted then we must back our leaders. It means the lives of our troops and our country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree military bearing must be maintained at all times as does all behavior in a job; the military and us as a country must do our utmost to make sure things are professional and run well at all times because this involves millions of lives every day and the protection of billions including our own country. I think we the families have a duty too to make sure things go smoothly so that they might do their job to the best of their ability and to comment out of turn sometimes violates certain things that can harm troops or our security. If we have questions we should take them up with our senators who can look into things but if it needs to be quieted then we must back our leaders. It means the lives of our troops and our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susanna</title>
		<link>http://armylive.dodlive.mil/index.php/2009/12/a-message-to-milbloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>susanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armylive.dodlive.mil/?p=1670#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>I sympathize with CJ especially in reference to the schoolboard. I have a daughter with special needs and last year was a nightmare. From being threatened by the principle to be kicked out when I visited my daughter to total ignorance from the special ed dept. Unfortunately, I found that unless I pull out the big guns - like CJ is- there was nothing I could do.I had little to combat their attitude. My daughter spend a year crying everyday she went to school and I felt totally helpless. I am glad things have changed this year and she is happy -therefore I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sympathize with CJ especially in reference to the schoolboard. I have a daughter with special needs and last year was a nightmare. From being threatened by the principle to be kicked out when I visited my daughter to total ignorance from the special ed dept. Unfortunately, I found that unless I pull out the big guns &#8211; like CJ is- there was nothing I could do.I had little to combat their attitude. My daughter spend a year crying everyday she went to school and I felt totally helpless. I am glad things have changed this year and she is happy -therefore I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
